I feel like such a flake. J. and I are reconsidering CC. To be clear, it's not because of anything bad about CC. They are still one of our top choices. But we've realized some misunderstandings about another top choice and now we're not so sure.
In self-defense, since this blog so far makes me look indecisive to the point of a serious mental illness, I am not usually this flaky. I have made several major decisions quickly and fairly easily. When I bought my first car, I only looked at one used car and never looked back with regret. When I bought my current "new" (now five years old) car I test-drove three models and bought one of them within 24 hours of finding out I needed to replace the old one. When I choose which college to go to, I only applied to one, got accepted by Halloween of senior year, and, with the exception of one major midnight freak-out, never seriously doubted that decision, either. With our house, we only looked at a few with a realtor and only considered two. Even with my husband, I knew within minutes of meeting him that he was the one and, while I had one case of cold feet in which I wanted to elope, LOL, I never doubted that he was the one nor have I once in the past 3+ years. So I am capable of major decisions! The only major decision in which I went back and forth was when I discerned religious life. Even then, I knew the convent I liked best fairly early. It just took a lot of time and back-and-forth to know if I truly belonged in a convent or not.
Also, this is the first major decision, other than the house, that my husband and I had to be in total agreement. It's also the first major decision that will forever affect an innocent child for their whole life, and it will also affect the birthmother for her whole life, too (at least to the extent that she chooses to let it affect her, meaning that she chooses how much to be involved or how much contact she has with us). It's also a major financial decision and, while the house costs considerably more, a house is seen as a good investment while the adoption is more optional and will only lead to many more expenses. I also plan to leave work to be a SAHM so that will cost us even more in lost income.
As for reevaluating the agency, it started yesterday afternoon when I was looking back at an agency in order to help another adoptive parent. While I had reluctantly eliminated that agency as being too expensive for us, I knew it was a good one and wanted to share it. When I looked at it again, however, I saw that I had misread the fees. It is actually half as much as I thought! Because it's such a good agency, that got my mind going. Like I said, nothing has changed with CC and it's still a top choice. I've liked this other agency for awhile, though, and only reluctantly decided against it earlier. We now have two great options.
One good thing has come out of all my looking into the agencies, however: we have now eliminated all but three agencies (out of an original seven) and one of those three just never seemed quite right. I can't even give a logical reason for it, but the third just never appealed to us in our gut. So hopefully we're really down to these two agencies. Both are excellent. Both are also very different. So we're comparing a really good apple to a really good orange. Either will be a good choice, we now have to decide which experience we'd prefer.
Before I get into how the agencies are different, I want to say something about discerning with my husband and how much better we've gotten at it. Up until last night, major discussions about adoption usually involved communication mistakes by the both of us including disengagement and defensiveness just to name a couple. We'd been getting better about it recently but it didn't dawn on me until last night. Even though we had decided on CC, when I brought up this other agency again, J. barely blinked before we got right into it. He was open to the discussion and interested. We've also gotten dramatically better about discussing two major tough issues: race and money. Before, either one of those topics would typically get one of us either to shut down the conversation or get really upset. Now, though, we've had lots of practice and we were able to get through one of our toughest discussions yet with much less drama. As J. said, we're growing in holiness which is the whole point of this. I love that man:-)
Dealing with issues of race has been the biggest eye-opener and, last night, I saw ways in which we have more resources then I previously thought to parent a Hispanic child. When I think about transracial adoption now, I have four qualities I would look for in deciding whether or not we have enough resources to parent a child of a particular race:
1. Do we have at least one close friend or family member who is that race?
2. Do we have at least one close friend or family member who highly supports our adoption of a child of that race? (without enough loved ones who are against it to cancel out that support or family members who are vocally racist against that race)?
3. Does our church contain a significant percentage of people of that race?
4. Does our neighborhood contain a significant percentage of people of that race?
Those have become my criteria and, while before I was hesitant about adopting a Hispanic child, I now see that we can say yes to all four questions. While I'm still nervous about a transracial adoption in general, I am more open to it at the same time. I think part of that is getting better at discussing it. The better we are at talking about it, the less foreign of an idea it seems. As long as we approach it as a transracial adoption (instead of pretending the issue doesn't exist) and as long as we can discuss it and continually learn ways to support our children, we will be starting in a good place.
Anyway, I mentioned that the two agencies are very different from each other. Agency A supports the expectant mother financially whether or not she decides to parent while Agency B is an adoption agency first and foremost. Both provide counseling and both allow the expectant mom to change her mind at anytime with no financial repercussions. Both agencies treat the birthmothers great (as far as we know anyway) and both have a birthmother support group. Agency B actually seems to have more resources for the birthmother before birth but, like I said, no concrete help for the birthmom who needs help to parent. While that was a major concern, we also have realized that, if an expectant mom fully intends to parent, she is more likely to go to a pregnancy resource center or to a place where she can get help with that. My husband and I financially support the local pregnancy resource center and believe in helping moms who need that extra support. That said, it doesn't make it wrong to go to an adoption agency, either, if that is what we want. After all, if an expectant mom goes to a place that has adoption in the name, she knows what she is there to learn about. As long as they aren't pressured into it we are supporting those women who want what they decide is for the best for their baby.
As for race, Agency A has one program regardless of race. That is my preference. Agency B has a special needs program, including AA children, children with severe health issues, and sibling groups. The cost for the special needs children is a little less, but not half as much like in many other agencies. It is not such a dramatic difference that it would affect our decision. And, as J. and I have learned, AA children are hard to place and do have special needs. This is a reality. While all people of color potentially face racism, I feel safe to say (despite having no experience with it myself) that it is different for African Americans. While all people of color have been mistreated in this country, both officially and in subtle ways, the AA experience is unique. So, while I do wish that program didn't cost less, I have less disagreement with it then before. Plus, while many agencies made me feel pressured to consider a special needs child, I don't feel that pressure with either Agency A or Agency B. I feel like J. and I can make the best decision for the child and for us with either one.
As for cost, the programs are different but both will likely be about the same. Agency A has a fixed fee based on a sliding scale and payment by installments. That fee covers the birthmom's medical expenses. Agency B has a smaller fixed fee plus the expenses particular for the birthmothers that choose us. With Agency B, the initial payment and the payment at placement will be about the same as with Agency A. It's the middle that is different. While at first I thought it would be much better to know what we are paying up front, now I see the value in paying the expenses of a particular woman. True, we are more likely to cope with feelings of resentment if a birthmom at Agency B changes her mind, in which case we lose that money and still have to pay the expenses for the next birthmom that chooses us. However, it will be nice to know that we're not going to pay medical bills until we've been matched and we agree to the match. While we wait, however, we don't pay anything with Agency B. Overall, we're likely to pay about the same amount regardless of which of these two agencies we choose, and both are the most reasonable of all the ones I've looked at. One serious difficulty with Agency B is that there are no refunds, whereas with Agency A there are if we have a serious reason to change our minds or if we somehow get pregnant. At the same time, because we don't pay the majority of the money until we have a match, we are not likely to lose as much money with Agency B (just the initial payment). With both agencies the homestudy fee is non-refundable.
Another difference is location. Agency A is local and only works with local adoptive families and local expectant mothers. Agency B works with people from all over the state and even the country. While J. had concerns about that in abstract, many of those concerns have been resolved by this particular agency. For one, their training is all done in one weekend. During that weekend we have time to get to know other potential adoptive parents. Plus, this agency isn't too far away, only about 3 hours or so, and it's in a very nice town that we've vacationed in before. Plus, other then that weekend, we don't need to go there for much (at least as far as I know so far). His main concern was communication with the birthmother as we want an open adoption. I've learned, however, that most communication with the birthfamily is through letters and phone calls (and email when possible). I have no problem whatsoever paying long distance to call the birthmom or even sending her a long-distance pre-paid phone card if that is the only thing impeding communication. The main benefit for having a local agency is it is easier for training but a weekend away to focus on adoption isn't bad, either. So having a local agency is nice but not as important to us.
As for the intangibles, Agency B just seems like such a positive group of people to be around. There is an advantage to working with people focused on adoption just like there is an advantage to working with people focused on helping expectant mothers. Agency A is smaller and local, Agency B is bigger and serves people from all over. Agency A is more about helping the needy of all kinds, Agency B is focused on helping complete families. Both are great! So it comes down to our gut. What experience do we prefer? I feel like Agency A is the noble choice, while my gut is feeling called more to Agency B. My husband is leaning towards Agency B, too, but he is unsure as well.
All of this back-and-forth has also helped me to become more humble. When I started on this adoption journey, I thought I had so much figured out. The more we discuss it, however, and the more we disagree, and more we talk with loved ones, the more I have to learn. I have come to see that there is no wrong way or right way to adopt, nor is there one answer for transracial adoption. I have seen that in some areas I was being judgmental and, while that is painful lesson to learn, it's better to learn that now then later. I'm more compassionate to all adoptive families. I also saw that one of the reasons that I was so quick to decide on CC is that it seemed like the noble thing to do because they financially support the expectant mother whether she chooses to parent or chooses to adopt. How important is it to be noble? Our adoption choices do say something about who we are and our values. So all of this debate is ultimately a good thing. I sure will be happy when we've been approved by an agency, though!